People v. De Waele
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFiles, J.
This appeal requires us to consider the right to counsel at a hearing where a defendant, whose probation before judgment has been revoked, is granted further probation conditioned upon spending additional time in the county jail. Our conclusion is that the latter order is appealable, and should be reversed because defendant’s counsel was not present.
On April 23, 1958, an information was filed containing eight counts, each charging defendant with issuing a check without sufficient funds in violation of Penal Code, section 476a. The information charged a prior conviction for violation of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re LeviCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- In Re OssloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- In Re DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- In Re BineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- In Re TurrietaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. YoungsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- In Re GraysonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- People v. WareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.