Legal Opinion

Abrams v. Worthington

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 24, 2006No. 05AP-912PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Klatt, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants, Jeffrey and Joyce Abrams, appeal from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas that granted summary judgment in favor of defendants-appellees, Charles M. Worthington and Michael Worthington. 1 For the following reasons, we affirm.

{¶ 2} Worthington does business as “A Family Moving Company,” which primarily provides household moving services. In late 2001, Joyce Abrams hired Worthington to move her and her husband’s belongings into their newly built house in Pataskala, Ohio. One of the three Worthington employees who…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Menifee v. Ohio Welding Products, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Byrd v. FaberOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State ex rel. Grady v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Jeffers v. OlexoOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Mergenthal v. Star Banc Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Capella III, L.L.C. v. WilcoxOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. RyanOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Richard Dent v. NflCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. Phillips v. TLC Plumbing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Guernsey Bank v. Milano Sports Enterprises, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API