Collora v. Navarro
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SAM D. JOHNSON, Justice.
The question presented for our decision in this case is a narrow one. The substantive legal issue is whether or not a directed verdict may be based on the uncontradicted testimony of a party to the lawsuit. To pose the question in its precise factual context, did the testimony of Ollie Collora, plaintiff below and petitioner here, establish as a matter of law one element (j. e., a present agreement to be husband and wife) of a common-law marriage between herself and Joe Collora when the other elements of such a marriage were conclusively proven by evidence other than…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
- Gevinson v. Manhattan Construction Co. of OklahomaTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- Henderson v. Travelers Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
- Najera v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1948
- Consolidated Underwriters v. KellyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by303 opinions
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Corbin v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
- Jackson v. Fiesta Mart, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
- Szczepanik v. First Southern Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
- Qantel Business Systems, Inc. v. Custom Controls Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
298 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.