Legal Opinion

Collora v. Navarro

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1978No. B-7622PublishedCited by 303 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAM D. JOHNSON, Justice.

The question presented for our decision in this case is a narrow one. The substantive legal issue is whether or not a directed verdict may be based on the uncontradicted testimony of a party to the lawsuit. To pose the question in its precise factual context, did the testimony of Ollie Collora, plaintiff below and petitioner here, establish as a matter of law one element (j. e., a present agreement to be husband and wife) of a common-law marriage between herself and Joe Collora when the other elements of such a marriage were conclusively proven by evidence other than…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Gevinson v. Manhattan Construction Co. of OklahomaTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Henderson v. Travelers Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Najera v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Consolidated Underwriters v. KellyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by303 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Corbin v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Jackson v. Fiesta Mart, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
  4. Szczepanik v. First Southern Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Qantel Business Systems, Inc. v. Custom Controls Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1988

298 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API