Legal Opinion

Najera v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1948No. A-1349PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Simpson

Leopoldo Najera sued The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company for $2,500.00 in damages for an injury he sustained while working in a baking plant operated by the Company in Dallas. The trial court entered judgment for Najera upon a jury verdict for $500.00, but the Dallas Court of Civil Appeals concluded as a matter of law that the mishap causing the injury was not, from the Company’s viewpoint, reasonably foreseeable, and, moreover, was due solely to Najera’s own negeligence. Accordingly, it reversed the judgment of the district court and rendered one in favor of the Company. 203 S. W. (2d)…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kirksey v. Southern Traction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Liberty Film Lines, Inc. v. PorterTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Lockley v. PageTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Lowry v. Anderson-Berney Building Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Fiesta Mart, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
  2. Collora v. NavarroTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Smith v. HengerTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Hopson v. Gulf Oil Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Company v. DeenTexas Supreme Court · 1958

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API