Hunter v. Haas
District Court, D. South Dakota
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION MICHAEL HUNTER, and all other 4:24-CV-04170-CCT similarly situated, Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED vs. IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND 1915 SCREENING DOCTOR HAAS, AVERA, SANFORD HEALTH, Defendants. Plaintiff Micheal Hunter, who is pro se, commenced this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1361, and requests that this Court “issue writ of mandamus and/or writ of prohibition order compelling respondents confine requirements of the law[.]” Docket 1 at 1. Hunter submitted a document he labels as a “SWORN…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.