Mercer v. Parker
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.
“It is a rule of practice in this state that a motion for nonsuit must specify the grounds therefor, and unless it does so an appellate court will not review the action of the trial court in denying the motion. (Cases cited.)” Robertson v. State Ind. Acc. Com., 114 Or. 394, 404, 405 (235 Pac. 684). Waiving that, the result is the same.
It is alleged in plaintiff’s complaint that plaintiff is a widow and informed defendants, who at all times mentioned in the complaint were the agents of plaintiff and to whom plaintiff paid a commission, that she had no knowledge of the value of real property…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Linebaugh v. Portland Mortgage Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1925
- Carty v. McMenamin & WardOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- J. C. Corbin Co. v. PrestonOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Larsen v. LootensOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Robertson v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Duhl v. Nash Realty Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Hansen v. HolmbergOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- MELGREEN ET UX v. McGUIRE, INC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958
- Sampen v. DabrowskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- State v. GilmoreOregon Supreme Court · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.