Legal Opinion

Ivey v. Rollins

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 2, 1959No. 596PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PbR CüRIAm.

A petition to rehear was submitted to the Court in Conference by the Justices to whom it was referred. Greene v. Lyles, 187 N.C. 598, 122 S.E. 297.

■ The petition to rehear is based on the failure of the Court to apply the doctrine of res ipsa loquitor to the facts in the case. No other question is raised.

Under our decisions, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitor is not applicable in this case. Lane v. Bryan, 246 N.C. 108, 97 S.E. 2d 411; Pemberton v. Lewis, 235 N.C. 188, 69 S.E. 2d 512; Etheridge v. Etheridge, 222 N.C. 616, 24 S.E. 2d 477; Springs v. Doll, 197 N.C. 240, 148 S.E, 251.

“Ge…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Springs v. . DollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Etheridge v. . EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Etheridge v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Lane v. BryanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Williamson v. RandallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Greene v. NicholsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Lane v. DorneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Richmond Medical Center for Women v. GilmoreDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999
  4. Fuller Ex Rel. Alford v. FullerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Greene v. NicholsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API