Patterson v. Byrd
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
WRIGHT, Presiding Judge.
This cáse arose from an automobile accident. Plaintiff was awarded a verdict with damages in the sum of $2,670. Her motion for new trial was denied. She appealed. The dispositive issue is whether a new trial should have been granted because of the inadequacy of the damage award.
It is basic in our law that a jury verdict is presumed correct. That presumption is strengthened on appeal when a motion for new trial has been denied by the trial judge. Woods v. Laster, 291 Ala. 139, 279 So.2d 121 (1973); Crum v. McGhee, 289 Ala. 244, 266 So.2d 855 (1972). A jury verdict…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. RandleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- King v. SturgisCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970
- Louisville N. R. Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Vinyard v. DuckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
- Jackson v. RoddySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ex Parte PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- K.P. v. ReedCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995