Legal Opinion
Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. Randle
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 24, 1927No. 6 Div. 736PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
In the matter of setting aside verdicts because of the inadequacy of the damages awarded, this court has adopted the rule laid down in Moseley v. Jamison, 68 Miss. 336, 8 So. 745 :
“It may be conceded that where there is no ¡standard for measuring damages, and no certain rule can be prescribed for the guidance of the .jury, the court should not ordinarily grant a new trial, although the damages awarded by the jury appear to be manifestly too small. In such ease of incertitude in the measure of damages, the matter must be left to the discretion of the jury; nor should its verdict be disturbed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McDonald v. . WalterNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Benton v. . CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Andrews v. FriersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
- Montgomery Light & Traction Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Doody v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Yarbrough v. MallorySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Stinson v. Acme Propane Gas Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. MurphySupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Birmingham News Co. v. LesterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- American Life Ins. Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.