Louisville N. R. Co. v. Robinson
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The suit is for damages as for a failure to transport a passenger.
When the averred facts show the relation of the parties and duty in the prem ises, a breach thereof may be pleaded by way of conclusion (Alabama F. & I. Co. v. Bush, 204 Ala. 658, 86 So. 541; Mobile L. & R. Co. v. Ellis, 209 Ala. 580, 96 So. 773), and, when the facts are alleged out of which a duty arises, the pleading need not charge the conclusion that the duty existed. Maddox v. Jones, 205 Ala. 598, 89 So. 38.
If the plaintiff had the right to enter the ear, and, in good faith, with the bona fide intention of becoming a…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. CrosbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Jones v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Yarbrough v. MallorySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Adler v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Reed v. L. Hammel Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. CarrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- INTERNATIONAL UNION, ETC. v. PalmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.