Legal Opinion

Keller v. Keller

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 2003No. NonePublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

[¶ 1.] Jane Keller (wife) appeals the trial court’s finding of contempt and a money judgment against her for failing to comply with court orders concerning a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO). By notice of review, Mark Keller (husband) asserts the trial court erred in not awarding him attorney fees.

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

[¶ 2.] On September 13, 2000, husband and wife entered into a stipulation and agreement relating to the dissolution of their marriage, which provided in relevant part:

[Wife] shall within the next 30 days take whatever steps are necessary to effectuate the transfer of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Malcolm v. MalcolmSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Billion v. BillionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Fox v. FoxSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Pesicka v. PesickaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Kier v. KierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Sazama v. State Ex Rel. MuilenbergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Hiller v. HillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Dejong v. DejongSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Taylor v. TaylorSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Taylor v. TaylorSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API