Legal Opinion
Muehlhausen v. Bath Iron Works
District Court, D. Maine
Decided January 20, 1993No. Civ. 92-34-P-CPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
GENE CARTER, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff, Mary Muehlhausen, raises a federal claim of retaliatory discharge under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3 and a pendant state claim under 5 M.R.S.A. § 4572, alleging that she was fired in retaliation for having filed two discrimination complaints with the Maine Human Rights Commission (“MHRC”). 1
FINDINGS OF FACT
Upon review of the credible testimony produced at trial from November 30, 1992 — December 2, 1992, the stipulations entered into by the parties, and the exhibits introduced, the Court finds the facts to be as set forth below.
Plaintiff began…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Annabelle Lipsett v. University of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Norman W. OLIVER, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Paul Carter v. William L. Ball, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Nelson v. University of Maine SystemDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1996
- Hott v. VDO Yazaki Corp.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1996
- Andrews v. AMERICAN RED CROSS BLOOD SERVICESDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2003
- Wytrwal v. MowlesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.