Legal Opinion
Nelson v. University of Maine System
District Court, D. Maine
Decided April 23, 1996No. Civil 95-0179-BPublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
BRODY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Richard Nelson and Edwin Jessi-man, professors at the University of Maine at Machias, sue the University of Maine System under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (“Title IX”), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1681-1688. Plaintiffs base their claims on the University’s alleged retaliatory employment action. Nelson and Jessiman originally filed a five-count complaint against the University. In a prior order, however, the Court granted Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Counts II (Jessiman’s First Amendment claim), IV…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Brown, Regina C. v. Brody, Kenneth D.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Mack Davis v. Town of Lake Park, Florida, a Florida Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Settle v. Baltimore CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1999
- Lowrey v. Texas a & M University SystemCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Lewis v. Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2002
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.