Legal Opinion

Delanty v. Yang Tsze Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1923No. 18251PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

This is an action hy the plaintiffs, Delanty and others, upon a contract of marine insurance whereby the defendant insurance association insured the tugboat “Bear” “for account of concerned”; that is, for the account and benefit of Tacoma Dredging Company, it having then the use and possession of the boat under a lease contract with the plaintiffs as owners thereof. A trial upon the merits in the superior court for Grays Harbor county, sitting with a jury, resulted in verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiffs for the full amount of the policy, from which the defendant has appealed to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. Central Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Chapman v. County of DouglasSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Hill County v. Shaw & Borden Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Higgins v. Insurance Company of North AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Glens Falls Insurance v. LongSupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
  3. Pacific Dredging Co. v. HurleyWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Zillah Transportation Co. v. Aetna Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  5. Land v. Franklin Nat. Ins. Co. of NYSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API