Delanty v. Yang Tsze Insurance
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
This is an action hy the plaintiffs, Delanty and others, upon a contract of marine insurance whereby the defendant insurance association insured the tugboat “Bear” “for account of concerned”; that is, for the account and benefit of Tacoma Dredging Company, it having then the use and possession of the boat under a lease contract with the plaintiffs as owners thereof. A trial upon the merits in the superior court for Grays Harbor county, sitting with a jury, resulted in verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiffs for the full amount of the policy, from which the defendant has appealed to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. Central Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Chapman v. County of DouglasSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Hill County v. Shaw & Borden Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
3Cited by12 opinions
- Higgins v. Insurance Company of North AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Glens Falls Insurance v. LongSupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
- Pacific Dredging Co. v. HurleyWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Zillah Transportation Co. v. Aetna Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Land v. Franklin Nat. Ins. Co. of NYSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.