Dennis v. Experian Infomation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND AMENDED OPINION
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
ORDER
The previous opinion, 504 F.3d 892 (9th Cir.2007), is amended as follows. The petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc is denied; no further petitions may be filed.
Page 897, Column 1, Line 22
After cnonmoving party).> insert footnote 4, stating:
<In its petition for rehearing, Experian complains that we didn’t give it an opportunity to be heard before entering summary judgment against it. See Verizon Delaware, Inc. v. Covad Comm’cns Co., 377 F.3d 1081, 1092 (9th Cir.2004). But Experian had ample opportunity to be heard on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. James C. DunkelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Ashley Hunt Greenwood v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Renie Guimond v. Trans Union Credit Information CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Lloyd Sarver v. Experian Information SolutionsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Gagnon Co., Inc. v. Nevada Desert InnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Carvalho v. Equifax Information Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Gorman v. Wolpoff & Abramson, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Sandra Cortez v. Trans UnionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Comite De Jornaleros De Redondo Beach v. City of Redondo BeachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Navajo Nation v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.