Legal Opinion
Padilla v. RRA, INC.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided September 8, 1997No. 17572PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTZ, Chief Judge.(1) RRA is a temporary personnel agency that supplies technical employees to national laboratories and other contractors. The agency pays the employee’s wages and benefits, and the contractor pays the agency for supplying the employee. In early 1993 Richard Padilla was employed by Kirk-Mayer, Inc., another temporary personnel agency, which provided his services to Sandia National Laboratories (Sandia) as an engineering associate. RRA decided to compete for the contract to supply that position to Sandia and advertised in a local paper for people qualified to fill it.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- C.R. Anthony Co. v. Loretto Mall PartnersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- Camino Real Mobile Home Park Partnership v. WolfeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Browne v. MaxfieldDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Gardner-Zemke Co. v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Gutierrez v. Sundancer Indian Jewelry, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Stock v. GranthamNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- Global Executive Management Solutions, Inc. v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 2017
- Hull v. FeinsteinNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
- Nelson v. HOMIER DISTRIBUTING CO., INC.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- Fiore Industries, Inc. v. EricssonDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.