Legal Opinion
Hull v. Feinstein
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided December 9, 2002No. 22,327PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WECHSLER, Judge.
{1} Plaintiff Gretchen Hull sued the City of Santa Fe (the City) and Andrew Feinstein, a neighbor and homeowner, alleging that she suffered injuries and consequential damages when her foot caught on a rise in the sidewalk, causing her to fall. Defendant Feinstein filed a jury demand before the district court granted summary judgment in his favor. That decision was not appealed. On remand from the Court of Appeals, Plaintiffs suit against the City was dismissed at the close of her case.
{2} On appeal, Plaintiff argues: (1) that she was entitled to a jury trial, and (2)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Royal American Managers, Incorporated v. Irc Holding Corporation and Joseph Ambriano, Cross-Appellants, Gerald Dolman, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Lopez Ex Rel. Lopez v. MaezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- Edward Allen White v. Wayne McGinnisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- White v. City of LovingtonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1967
- Carlile v. Continental Oil CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- New Mexico v. General Electric Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2004
- Truong v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
- Mayer v. SmithNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- Truong v. Allstate Insurance Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. StallingsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.