Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Waterloo, Cedar Falls & Northern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 26, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, C. J.

Application for a certificate of convenience and necessity to operate as a motor carrier under the provisions of Chapter 252-A1, Code of 1927, was filed with the state board of railroad commissioners on April 26, 1927, by the Waterloo, Cedar Falls & Northern Eailway Company. The application in form and substance complied fully with all statutory requirements. Due notice was given, and time fixed for hearing the application.

On or about December, 1922, the Eed Ball Transportation Company, having a certificate of convenience and necessity, commenced the operation of a motor bus line between…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Public Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Lykins v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  3. State v. Department of Public WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Hammond Lumber Co. v. Public Service CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Cincinnati Traction Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Haas v. Iowa State Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  2. Application of Illinois Cent. R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API