Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Traction Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1925No. 19023PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

Upon error proceedings to cases arising in courts of common pleas and later heard in the Court of Appeals, this court will not weigh the evidence. Upon error proceedings to this court from an order of the Public Utilities Commission, no intermediate court has had an opportunity to review and weigh the evidence. Hence in such an error proceeding, unless this court reviews the evidence, the plaintiff in error is deprived entirely of the consideration of that feature of the case. It is for this reason that it has previously been held that in an error proceeding filed in this court to an order of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ohio Utilities Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Furstenberg v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Ferguson-Steere Motor Co. v. State Corp. CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Public Service Commission v. ByronCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  4. H. & K. Motor Transportation, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Scioto Valley Ry. & Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API