Legal Opinion
Nordstrom v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 30, 1963No. Civ. A. 3608-59PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLTZOFF, District Judge.
This ease is now before the Court for an adjudication of a cross-claim for indemnity interposed by the defendant District of Columbia against its co-defendant Sinclair Refining Company. The action was brought by a woman and her husband against both defendants, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by her ,as a result of a fall on a public highway. The District of Columbia filed a cross-claim for indemnity against its co-defendant. It was agreed that the cross-claim should be determined as a matter of law by the Court after the jury returned a verdict on…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Washington Gas Light Co. v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- McFall v. Compagnie Maritime Belge (Lloyd Royal) S. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Union Stock Yards Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- District of Columbia v. WoodburySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Ross v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- R. & G. Orthopedic Appliances & Prosthetics, Inc. v. CurtinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- East Penn Manufacturing Co. v. PinedaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Williams v. Steuart Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- American Building Maintenance Co. v. L'Enfant Plaza Properties, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- District of Columbia v. Pauline Nordstrom, Sinclair Refining Company v. Pauline NordstromCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.