Legal Opinion

Rollins Outdoor Advertising v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 6, 1985No. 72 E.D. Appeal Docket, 1984Published

1Opinion of the Court

506 Pa. 592 (1985)

487 A.2d 794

ROLLINS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING and American and Foreign Insurance Company, Appellants,

v.

WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD and Joseph Maas, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued October 23, 1984.

Decided February 6, 1985.

Reargument Denied April 29, 1985.

Roger B. Wood, Philadelphia, for appellants.

Thomas F. McDevitt, Philadelphia, for Joseph Maas.

Leroy S. Zimmerman, Atty. Gen., Henry A. Riley, Harrisburg, Amicus Curiae, for Bureau of Workers' Comp.

Before LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, HUTCHINSON, ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Justice.

W…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rollins Outdoor Advertising v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. RombergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Leaseway Systems, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Bair v. Susquehanna Collieries Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Rollins Outdoor Advertising v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API