Legal Opinion

Rollins Outdoor Advertising v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 21, 1983No. Appeal, No. 915 C.D. 1982PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

President Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

Rollins Outdoor Advertising appeals a "Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board order affirming a referee ’s decision to dismiss its termination petition and awarding attorneys’ fees to Joseph Maas’ compensation attorney. We reverse and remand.

In 1967, Maas was injured in a work-related accident which left him totally disabled. Compensation payments were to be paid at the weekly rate of $52.50. Rollins filed a termination petition, alleging that Maas was no longer .totally disabled as of January 29, 1974, and that he had received a substantial third-party…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. General v. E. Roseman Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Green v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Del VecchioCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Brown v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rollins Outdoor Advertising v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Rollins Outdoor Advertising v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API