Legal Opinion
Haggart v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 26, 2012No. 09-103LPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
Before the court in this rails-to-trails case is the parties’ joint motion to establish subclasses. The court previously certified a class consisting of “[a]ll persons owning an interest in lands located on one or more segments of the railroad corridor or right-of-way on which a rail line was formerly operated by the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company in King County, Washington.” Haggart v. United States, 89 Fed.Cl. 523, 536 (2009). Having now completed the class-notice proceedings, the parties report that Mr. and Mrs. Haggart have been joined by…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Thomas L. Jenkins v. United Gas Corporation and Allan B. CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- In the Matter of Rhone-Poulenc Rorer IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Haggart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Haggart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Haggart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Haggart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Haggart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.