Burr v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge.
This case deals with a secondary boycott under the 1959 Landrum-Griffin Amendments1 to the Act. We hold that the consumer picket line constitutes a *615violation of § 8(b) (4) (i) and (ii).2 We also hold that in some particulars the order should be made more precise. The result is that we sustain the Board’s petition to enforce, Perfection’s petition to reverse the order denying relief under § (i) and to make the order more specific, and deny the Union’s petition to set aside the order adjudging a violation of § (ii). The case has a long and tortuous history. Begun in…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Express Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tisch Hotels, Inc. v. Atlanta Americana Motor Hotel Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1966
- Borough v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Samuel H. Burr and Perfection Mattress & Spring Company v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. United Wholesale and Warehouse Employees, Local 261, Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, Afl-Cio, United Wholesale and Warehouse Employees, Local 261, Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963