Legal Opinion

Foster v. Cuyahoga Department of Health & Human Services

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 6, 2001No. 00-3746PublishedCited by 219 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ronald Foster, proceeding pro se, appeals a district court order denying him permission to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in the district court. Foster filed the motion in conjunction with his civil rights complaint filed under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983, and state law. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

Foster submitted his application for pauper status…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Charles W. Sears Real Estate, Inc., Dba Sears Real Estate and Charles W. Sears, Appeal of Charles W. SearsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  2. Allen Raymond Phipps v. Phylliss KingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988

3Cited by219 opinions

  1. ASHLEY HUMPHREY, individually and as next friend of J.H., a minor v. MAURY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2026
  2. Abram v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
  3. Adrienne Harmon v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2026
  4. Aholusi J. Pillow v. Wellmed Management Inc. and Jennifer Gardner, Trainer/SupervisorDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2026
  5. Amanda J. Goodwin Shenker v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026

214 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API