Legal Opinion

Aldrich v. Wilmarth

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1893PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Beadle county. Hon. A. W. Campbell, Judge. Action by George W. Aldrich and Jacob E. Huffman, partners as Aldrich & Huffman, against Alma E.. Wilmarth, to recover a balance due on a building contract and for extra work. There was judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals. The facts are fully stated in the opinion. It is incumbent upon a party dealing with an agent to ascertain the extent of his power.

Read the full summary

Appeal from circuit court, Beadle county. Hon. A. W. Campbell, Judge. Action by George W. Aldrich and Jacob E. Huffman, partners as Aldrich & Huffman, against Alma E.. Wilmarth, to recover a balance due on a building contract and for extra work. There was judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals. The facts are fully stated in the opinion. It is incumbent upon a party dealing with an agent to ascertain the extent of his power. Story, Ag. § 136; Roberts v. Rumley, 12 N. W. 326; Owings v. Hull, 9 Pet. 246; Wheelon v. Muguire, 2 Law Rep. 808; Bond y. Pontiac, 62 Micb. 648; Bant v.…

1Opinion of the CourtCorsoN, J.

This is an action to recover a balance claimed to be due on a budding' contract, and for the -value:, of extra work and material furnished. Judgment for the plaintiffs, and the defendant appeals. The facts, briefly stated, are as follows: The plaintiffs entered into a contract with the defendant to erect for her a brick building for the sum of $10,700, of which the sum of $10,600 was paid before the institution of this action, leaving a • balance, as claimed by the plaintiffs, of $100 still due them on the original contract. They also claimed the sum of $242.76 as due them for extra work and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. . BradyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Glacius v. . BlackNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Phillip v. . GallantNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. Champlin v. RowleyNew York Supreme Court · 1835
  5. Griggs v. SeldenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1886

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. National Surety Co. v. MiozranySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Northern Farm Supply, Inc. v. SprecherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Anderson v. ToddNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Potter v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Hulst v. Benevolent Hall Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API