Legal Opinion
United States v. Marsten Apartments, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided June 16, 1997No. 95-CV-75178-DTPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO INTERVENE
KOMIVES, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. OPINION
A. Background
1. Procedural Background
The United States of America brings this action pursuant to the Fair Housing Act of 1988, 42 U.S.C. § 3614(a). The United States alleges that defendants have engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination on the basis of race, color, and familial status at the Marsten Apartments, located in Allen Park, Michigan. On May 1, 1997, Judge Cohn referred all pending and future nondispositive motions to me for hearing and determination pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Scotty Grubbs, the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Proposed Intervenor/appellant v. Stephen H. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Coalition of Arizona/New Mexico Counties for Stable Economic Growth v. Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Oakland County v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. Slater Steels Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2004
- United States v. HenryDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
- Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. GassmanDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2021
- Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. LannomDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2021
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.