Legal Opinion

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. Slater Steels Corp.

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided February 24, 2004No. 1:03CV420PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

COSBEY, United States Magistrate Judge.

Pending is a motion for leave to intervene filed by the United Steelworkers of America (“the Union”), on January 6, 2004. On February 9, 2004, Plaintiff, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”), filed an objection and on February 23, 2004, the Union replied.1 For the following reasons, the motion to intervene will be granted.

BACKGROUND

PBGC is a wholly-owned United States Government corporation established pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1302(a) to administer the *341pension plan termination insurance program created by the Employee Retirement and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Security Insurance Company of Hartford v. Schipporeit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Marsten Apartments, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
  3. Bruce v. International Longshoremen's Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Belk, Sr. v. WatsonDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2021
  2. Calvelage v. OnTime Express, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2023
  3. Melcher v. Central States Enterprises, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API