Legal Opinion

City of St. Paul v. DiBucci

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 9, 1975No. 44682PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*98MacLaughuin, Justice.

The sole issue in this case is whether a defendant testifying on his own behalf may have his credibility impeached by evidence of a prior conviction of a municipal ordinance. We hold that he cannot and reverse for a new trial.

Defendant, Carl DiBucci, was found guilty of simple assault by a district court jury in a de novo trial following his appeal from a conviction in the municipal court of St. Paul. During his trial in district court, while defendant was testifying on his own behalf, the city attorney attempted to impeach defendant’s credibility by introducing evidence…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. WestSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. Carter v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. State v. CurrieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  4. State v. RobitshekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  5. State v. StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. BrouilletteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. State v. GasslerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  3. State v. HeidelbergerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. State v. TateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  5. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API