Legal Opinion

Gramlich v. Munsey

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1992No. 900466PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

Plaintiff Dana Gramlich appeals from a summary judgment dismissing her malpractice action for failure to comply in a timely manner with the prelitigation review requirements of the Utah Health Care Malpractice Act (“the Act”). Because we do not find that a failure to initiate prelitigation review within 60 days of serving a notice of intent to commence an action (“notice”) is a jurisdictional bar, we reverse.

In reviewing motions for summary judgment, we view the facts in a light most favorable to the nonmoving party. D & L Supply v. Saurini, 775 P.2d 420, 421 (Utah 1989). We…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tewari v. TsoutsourasNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. D & L SUPPLY v. SauriniUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Avila v. WinnUtah Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Jensen v. IHC Hospitals, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Julian v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Selvage v. J.J. Johnson & AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996
  4. Andreini v. HultgrenUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Hansen v. Department of Financial InstitutionsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API