Gramlich v. Munsey
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DURHAM, Justice:
Plaintiff Dana Gramlich appeals from a summary judgment dismissing her malpractice action for failure to comply in a timely manner with the prelitigation review requirements of the Utah Health Care Malpractice Act (“the Act”). Because we do not find that a failure to initiate prelitigation review within 60 days of serving a notice of intent to commence an action (“notice”) is a jurisdictional bar, we reverse.
In reviewing motions for summary judgment, we view the facts in a light most favorable to the nonmoving party. D & L Supply v. Saurini, 775 P.2d 420, 421 (Utah 1989). We…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tewari v. TsoutsourasNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- D & L SUPPLY v. SauriniUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Avila v. WinnUtah Supreme Court · 1990
3Cited by14 opinions
- Jensen v. IHC Hospitals, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1997
- Julian v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- Selvage v. J.J. Johnson & AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996
- Andreini v. HultgrenUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- Hansen v. Department of Financial InstitutionsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.