Legal Opinion

Valmet Paper MacHinery, Inc. v. Beloit Corp.

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided October 7, 1994No. 93-C-587-CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CRABB, Chief Judge.

This is an action for patent infringement, presently before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The basis of defendant’s motion is a claim that plaintiffs lacked standing to institute or maintain this action. For the reasons expressed below, defendant’s motion will be denied. 1

FACTS

The facts relevant to defendant’s motion are not in dispute. United States Patent No. 3,868,780 (“ ’780 patent”) issued on March 4, 1975 to Valmet Oy, a Finnish corporation that had been…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Crown Die & Tool Co. v. Nye Tool & MacHine WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. United States v. Fred F. Solomon, Jr., United States of America v. George G. NicoladzeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. McClaskey v. Harbison-Walker Refractories Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
  5. Afros S.P.A. v. Krauss-Maffei Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Procter & Gamble Co. v. Paragon Trade Brands, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1995
  2. Sunrise Medical HHG, Inc. v. AirSep Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. IndyMac Bank v. MiguelHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Bhandari v. Cadence Design Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2007
  5. New Medium Technologies LLC v. Barco N.V.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API