Legal Opinion
Bhandari v. Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided May 11, 2007No. 6:06 CV 480PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DAVIS, District Judge.
Before the Court are Defendants Cadence Design Systems, Inc., Magma De sign Automation, Inc., Altera Design Corp., and Mentor Graphics Corp.’s (collectively “Defendants” 1 ) Motion to Dismiss or Transfer (Docket No. 33) and Plaintiff Narpat Bhandari’s Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint (Docket No. 46). The Court has considered the parties’ written arguments. Because the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to hear this case, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion to dismiss and DENIES Bhandari’s motion for leave.
BACKGROUND
Narpat…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Textile Productions, Inc. v. Mead Corporation and Fiber Trim Sewing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Michael A. HillmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Aspex Eyewear, Inc. v. Miracle Optics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. Paragon Trade Brands, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Larson v. Foster (In re Foster)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- IP Innovation L.L.C. v. Google, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2009