State v. Vietto
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
COPELAND, Justice.
The defendant contends the trial court erred in denying her motion for a directed verdict of not guilty at the close of all of the *12evidence. We agree; therefore, the decision of the Court of Appeals must be reversed.
The trial judge correctly charged the jury that to convict the defendant of violating G.S. 115-166, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that for the time period specified in the indictment, the defendant caused her child not to attend a public school or a nonpublic one that had been approved by the State Board of Education,2 The State’s proof that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- State v. ChavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980