Legal Opinion

State v. Jones

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 21, 2011No. COA10-1202PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, Robert C., Judge.

Defendants Jerry Lee Jones and Tina Jones appeal their convictions for failing to cause their daughter “P.J.” to attend school, in violation of North Carolina’s Compulsory Attendance Law (“CAL”), N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 115C-378 to 383 (2009). 1 Defendants primarily contend that the trial court erred in denying their respective motions to dismiss the charge for insufficient evidence. We conclude, however, that the State presented substantial evidence of each element of the offense, and, therefore, the court properly submitted the charge against each defendant to the jury.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  3. State v. VauseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Matter of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. State v. CrawfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. RandolphCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  2. State v. FoxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  3. State v. CoburnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  4. State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  5. State v. TalbertCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API