Legal Opinion

Jaehne v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 27, 1951No. Civ. 18042PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment entered pursuant to an order granting a motion for judgment to be entered in accordance with a prior motion for a directed verdict (Code Civ. Proe., § 630) in an action for damages for personal injuries. A motion by defendant for a directed verdict was denied. The jury disagreed and á mistrial was declared. Thereafter defendant’s motion under section 630 was granted and judgment entered.

The rules governing the determination of a motion made under section 630 of the Code of Civil Procedure are the same as those applicable to motions for a judgment…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Oettinger v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Peterson v. LoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Finnegan v. Royal Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Blumberg v. M. & T. IncorporatedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Neel v. Mannings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bigbee v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Johnson Ex Rel. Johnson v. American Motors Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Gilbert v. Pessin Grocery Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Heller v. Pillsbury Madison & SutroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. Tierstein v. LichtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API