Legal Opinion

Bonaparte v. Nelson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 1, 1929No. 20068PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwindall, J.

This action comes to this court on appeal from the district court of Oklahoma county, wherein George P. Nelson, as plaintiff, commenced an action against E, B. Bonaparte, county treasurer of Oklahoma county, Okla., as defendant, to recover certain taxes paid by him under protest for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1928, and which he claims were illegally levied.

Briefly stated, the defendant in error contends that the tax is illegal upon five distinct and separate grounds, namely: (1) That the financial statement and estimate of needs was not published as is by law required ; (2) that the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Board of Com'rs of Garfield Co. v. FieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Southern Surety Co. v. WaitsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Southwestern Surety Ins. Co v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Vaughn v. School District Thirty-OneOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  5. People v. Eureka Lake & Yuba Canal Co.California Supreme Court · 1874

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jones v. BlaineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Berryman v. BonaparteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. Turner v. PittsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Jackson v. SadlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Protest of Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API