Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Sadler

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 30, 1935No. 25180PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This controversy is wholly between the plaintiff in error and the defendant in error M. B. Sadler. There has been no change in the relative position of these two parties since the action was instituted, and they will be referred to herein as plaintiff and defendant, as they appeared in the trial court.

The plaintiff commenceed this action as a taxpayer for and on behalf of himself and other taxpayers similarly situated to set aside a deed that was made, executed, and delivered by the chairman of the board of county commissioners of Mayes county to the defendant conveying to the defendant four…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stone v. WinnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Kiniry v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Airy v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Eaton v. Mooresville Graded SchoolSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Mitchell v. LeonardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Tal v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  2. Johnson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  3. Hefner v. CravensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  4. Hamilton v. Town of Valley BrookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  5. State Ex Rel. Tal v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API