Legal Opinion
County of Santa Clara v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 25, 1994No. C-93-20169 RPAPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
AGUILAR, District Judge.
Defendant Employers Reinsurance Corporation (ERC) moves for reconsideration of this court’s June 16, 1994 order granting Plaintiff County of Santa Clara (“County”) and Co-Defendant United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company’s (USF & G) motion for summary judgment and granting USF & G’s motion for determination of good faith settlement. In the alternative, ERC asks this Court to certify the June 16 order for immediate appellate review. In July 1994, this case was transferred from Judge Ware to the undersigned for all purposes.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kern-Tulare Water District v. City of BakersfieldDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1986
- Signal Companies, Inc. v. Harbor Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
- Olympic Insurance v. Employers Surplus Lines InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- United States v. M/V Santa Clara IDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Reffitt v. NixonDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996
- Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
- Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
- LMC Vineyards, LLC v. Allied World National Assurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025
- Northern Assurance Co. of America v. Thomson Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.