Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Northern Assurance Co. of America v. Thomson Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 2, 2013No. 49A04-1208-PL-400Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBaker, Judge

I concur with the majority’s conclusions that ESLIC did not waive its choice-of law argument and that under a choice-of-law analysis, California law applies. However, I part ways with the majority’s application of California law, trusting that if our envi*800ronmentally-conscious colleagues to the west were confronted with this issue, they would no longer permit their environment to go uncleansed.

To begin, Congress passed The Federal Comprehensive Environmental Responsibility, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) to facilitate the prompt cleanup of hazardous waste sites. Cnty. of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Watts v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Foster-Gardner, Inc. v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Ameron Internat. Corp. v. Insurance Co. of State of PennsylvaniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  4. County of Santa Clara v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API