Legal Opinion
Maritrans v. Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 29, 1990No. 1204 and 1564PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge:
Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz (Pepper), a Philadelphia based law firm, appeals the order granting injunctive relief to Maritrans G.P., Inc., Maritrans Partners, L.P. and Mari-trans Operating Partners, L.P.’s (Maritrans), a Philadelphia based transportation company. The preliminary injunction enjoins Pepper’s legal representation of seven New York based transportation companies. Moran Towing & Transportation (Moran), one of the New York transportation companies, appeals the order denying its petition to intervene in the action between Pepper and Maritrans. By order of September 13,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- United States of America Ex Rel. Harry E. Carey v. A. T. Rundle, Supt.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,675 James M. Richardson v. Hamilton International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Mitchell A. KRAMER and David C. Harrison v. SCIENTIFIC CONTROL CORP. Et Al. Appeal of ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- In Re Estate of PedrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- W. Channing Nicholas, M.D. v. Pennsylvania State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Maritrans GP Inc. v. Pepper, Hamilton & ScheetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Nicholas v. Pennsylvania State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Maritrans GP Inc. v. Pepper, Hamilton & ScheetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Smith, C. v. Giovinetti, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.