Legal Opinion

Maritrans GP Inc. v. Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 29, 1992No. 99 E.D. Appeal Docket 1990Published

1Opinion of the Court

529 Pa. 241 (1992)

602 A.2d 1277

MARITRANS GP INC., Maritrans Partners L.P. and Maritrans Operating Partners L.P., Appellants,

v.

PEPPER, HAMILTON & SCHEETZ and J. Anthony Messina, Jr., Esquire, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued January 17, 1991.

Decided January 29, 1992.

Richard A. Sprague, Denise Pallante, William P. Murphy, Howard K. Goldstein, Gerald E. Arth, Joseph T. Pallante, Philadelphia, for appellants.

Geoffrey C. Hazard, Jr., Sterling Professor of Law, New Haven, Conn., for amicus in support of appellants.

Francis P. Newell, Arthur G. Raynes, Philadelphia, Stephen Gillers, New…

Also in this document: Dissent · Nix; Dissent · Flaherty.

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Woods v. City Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. T. C. Theatre Corp. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  3. Alfred B. Freeman v. Chicago Musical Instrument Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  4. Adler, Barish, Daniels, Levin & Creskoff v. EpsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Silver Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corporation and Chrysler Realty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API