Legal Opinion

Zimmerman v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 5, 1931No. Appeal, 43PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff sued to recover for injuries sustained at the time the truck he was driving was struck by one of defendant’s trains at a grade crossing. The case came before us on a previous appeal and was sent back to the court below for retrial because the damages awarded, $20,000, were considered excessive: 297 Pa. 390. Following the second trial and verdict in plaintiff’s favor, the court in banc refused defendant’s motions for judgment non obstante veredicto and for a new trial. This appeal followed.

Briefly, the circumstances of the collision were as follows : Plaintiff was driving…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Saxman v. McCormickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Zimmerman v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kline v. KachmarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Kubit v. RussSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Lazarus v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Sanders v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Sleasman v. Brooks, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API