Legal Opinion

Zimmerman v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 8, 1929No. Appeal, 167PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Feazee,

This appeal is from the refusal of the court below to grant a new trial or enter judgment n. o. v., and from the entry of judgment upon the verdict. The action was instituted by plaintiff to recover damages for personal injuries he alleges were sustained through the negligence of defendant company. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff and awarded damages in the sum of $20,000.

We have given particular attention to the record of the case and as a result of that study have reached the conclusion that the verdict is excessive and not justified by the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Goldman v. Mitchell-Fletcher Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. King v. Equitable Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Thirkell v. Equitable Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Baymond v. SternbergerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Zimmerman v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Parkin v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API