Legal Opinion

Kline v. Kachmar

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1948No. Appeal, 92PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

This is a suit for the recovery of damages for injuries to the plaintiff’s person and property in an automobile collision caused, allegedly, by the defendant’s negligence. Upon trial, the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff. The learned court below overruled the defendant’s motions for judgment n. o. v. and for a new trial; and, from the judgment entered on the verdict, the defendant appeals and assigns for error the lower court’s refusal of his motions.

The reasons advanced in support of the motion for judgment n. o. v. are (1) that the evidence is…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Conley v. MervisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Wagner v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Thomas & Sons v. Loose, Seaman & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  4. Davis v. American Ice Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Dunmore v. PaddenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LopinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. BurnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Cohen v. Albert Einstein Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Commonwealth v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Lewis v. QuinnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API