Legal Opinion

Williams v. Benefit Trust Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 11, 1965No. 44,088PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Price, J.:

This is an action on an “Accident and Sickness Income” insurance policy.

The insured will be referred to as plaintiff and the insurance company as defendant.

Basically, the dispute arises over the question as to which benefits of the policy apply—sickness or accident.

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence the court sustained defendant’s motion for a directed verdict in its favor.

Plaintiff has appealed from that ruling.

A copy of the entire policy is not included in the record on appeal. Portions of it are abstracted. Other portions are set out in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Revell v. BennettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  2. Casement v. GearhartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Schneider v. Washington National InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  2. Elliott v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  3. Williams v. Benefit Trust Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  4. Bingham v. Hillcrest Bowl, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  5. Boring v. HaynesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API