Legal Opinion

Boring v. Haynes

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 6, 1972No. 46,370PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harman, C.:

This is an action by the beneficiaries under a group policy of accident insurance for recovery of death benefits. Plaintiffs contend the insured’s death was occasioned by accidental bodily injury; defendant insurer denies this assertion and says it was caused directly or indirectly, wholly or partly by disease.

The trial court sustained defendant’s motion for summary judgment and plaintiffs have appealed.

Pertinent portions of the certificate of insurance are:

“Underwriters . . . agree . . . if . . . the Assured shall sustain accidental bodily…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pinkston v. Rice Motor Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  2. Williams v. Benefit Trust Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  3. Miller v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  4. Thompson v. Aetna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  5. Rankin v. United Commercial Travelers of AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Whitaker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1989
  2. Foster v. Stonebridge Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
  3. Life Insurance Co. of North America v. EvansMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Thomas v. Benchmark InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
  5. Gottfried v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API