Legal Opinion

Bingham v. Hillcrest Bowl, Inc.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 13, 1967No. 44,727PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

O’Connor, J.:

This action was brought under the provisions of G. S. 1961 Supp., 44-504, in the name of the injured employee, Olive Bingham, for her benefit and for the benefit of her employer, Joy’O, Inc., and its insurance carrier, Royal Indemnity Company, against a third party tort-feasor, Hillcrest Bowl, Inc., seeking to recover damages for personal injuries received by the plaintiff when she slipped and fell in defendant’s bowling alley.

The case was previously before this court in Bingham v. Hillcrest Bowl, Inc., 193 Kan. 201, 392 P. 2d 942, and we…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Moeser v. ShunkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  2. Little v. ButnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  3. Moyer v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  4. Sundgren v. Topeka Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  5. Parks v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Knowles v. KlaseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  2. Schenck v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  3. Smithson v. DunhamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  4. Miller v. City of LanderWyoming Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Autry v. Walls I. G. A. Foodliner, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API