Casement v. Gearhart
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Price, J.:
This was an action to recover for personal injuries.
A ruling on the demurrer to plaintiff’s evidence was reserved.
Defendants then introduced their evidence.
Plaintiff introduced evidence in rebuttal.
Defendants offered no evidence in surrebuttal.
At the close of all the evidence, both sides having rested, defend*443ants renewed their demurrer and, in addition, moved for judgment upon the entire record.
The court sustained the motion for judgment on the ground “the record in this case fails to prove or show any cause of action in favor of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schmid v. EslickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Revell v. BennettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
- Weber v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
- Hickey v. Fox-Ozark Theatres Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1942
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hiniger v. JudySupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
- Southards v. Central Plains InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
- Bendure v. Great Lakes Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- Johnston, Administratrix v. EcordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- Morris v. FranciscoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.