Legal Opinion

Otto v. Farmers Insurance Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 8, 1977No. KCD 28240PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as insured), under the uninsured motorist coverage of his automobile insurance policy, brought suit against defendant (hereinafter referred to as insurer) for bodily injuries sustained as the result of a vehicular collision with an uninsured motorist. The trial court sustained insurer’s motion for summary judgment, and insured has appealed.

Rule 74.04(c) provides that summary judgment “shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Mullis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. Touchette v. Northwestern Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Chavez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. v. ReavesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  5. Nygaard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Harvey v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Cardin v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  4. Cano v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  5. Hillman v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1988

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API