Legal Opinion
Cornelius v. Nutt
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 24, 1985No. 83-1673PublishedCited by 117 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blackmun
Under the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, Pub. L. 95-454, 92 Stat. 1111, a federal employee may challenge agency disciplinary action by appealing the agency’s decision to the Merit Systems Protection Board (Board). If, however, the employee is a member of a collective-bargaining unit of federal employees, he, in the alternative, may challenge the disciplinary action by pursuing any grievance and arbitration procedure provided by the collective-bargaining agreement. Neither the Board nor the arbitrator may sustain the agency’s decision if the employee “shows harmful error in the application…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lindahl v. Office of Personnel ManagementSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms v. Federal Labor Relations AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by117 opinions
- Jon Keith Smith v. Michael Groose Missouri Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Garcia v. Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- William F. Curtin v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Thomas O. Barnes v. Harold I. Small, GeneralCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Salvatore Giove v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.